Will the code work on my site?

With the myriad of combinations, webmasters and coding around the Globe, the simplest way to find out is to try it.
Known issues – occasionally some Word-press sites that are not up to date, the widget may break CSS (fix is often as easy as update, theme or plugins).
Some form types and data may require addressing.

Why

We have been in this space a very long time, (pre ADA and global awareness that shutting users out of digital options was not really in anyone’s interest)
Our team include folks with a range of challenges from visual to physical. So it was a natural flow that not only would we ensure our sites were, at the very least, able to be viewed by everyone working on them.
But clearly the vast array of accessible options did not work for everyone  – and how could this be OK in the century we live in, with its endless opportunities

The widget encompasses an array of profiles:
eg Early learning, reading online was clear that folks who found it difficult to focus were not getting any value at all, as the distractions of online marketing and site inclusions ensured they missed the crucial parts that they could not focus on.
This profile narrows the viewing window so the reader can simply focus on the words or section with no other distractions.
eg: Visual options – even after sites were built with high contrast and clean fonts; there are a whole range of nuances that all play a huge role in end-users being able to read, regardless of what machines dictate.
So specific contrast, light, line heights, enlargement included in the widget vastly improved this problem.
Start a Free – no obligation – Trial today.

Can you do a site audit?

Yes indeed, a Site Audit is performed in combination with each widget. 
Audits are generally performed by-monthly whilst the widget is installed.
If you only want a site audit at this time, reach out in the chat.
Note: as above, that may not provide the results your users need.
Enquire or start a Free – no obligation – Trial today.

Costs

Are per site – there are monthly or yearly payment options.
$69 per month including weekly site monitor/audit (daily by per-case basis)   – If you have a coupon-code, deal price/discount is grandfathered for the life of the account.
We certainly assist where necessary and have a mission to offer equal digital access to all, regardless if you have a brand new online presence with a single page or, an NGO, Franchise and multiple Site options.
Start a Free – no obligation – Trial today.

Thoughts to consider 

Some websites that have installed the widget were not even aware that folks were trying to access content or having difficulties until the “thank-you”  messages started coming in.
————————————–

And YES there have indeed been Lawsuits mounted against site owners/operators for not providing equal access online.
Robles v. Domino’s Pizza was a landmark case that underlines the need for accessibility.  SIX YEARS of litigation. Notice of Settlement filed with the district court on June 6, 2022  (not only highlights the confusion that most Business owners are faced with, but who really wants to exclude users of their service and why?)

These Equal Accesslawsuits were initially aimed at high profile sites, and emanating mostly from the US; but as time has moved on that is no longer the case.
Some current and recent cases include:

The Hard Rock class action lawsuit is Christopher Loadholt v. Hard Rock Café International (USA), Inc., Case No. 1:22-cv-07099, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. (Website barriers to equal access) 

The Speedo class action lawsuit is Valerie Dicks v. Warnaco Swimwear Products Inc. d/b/a Speedo USA, Case No. 1:22-cv-07145, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. (Website barriers to equal access)

The Harvard University class action lawsuit is Milagros Senior v. Harvard University, Case No. 1:22-cv-08576 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.  (Website barriers to equal access for visually impaired users)

The Western Union class action lawsuit is Miriam Cruz v. Western Union Holdings Inc., Case No. 1:22-cv-05462, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. (Website barriers to equal access)

The Dark Horse Comics Website Class Action Lawsuit is Cordero v. Dark Horse Comics, LLC, Case No. 1:22-cv-04283, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. (Website barriers to equal access)

and numerous others in recent times relating to digital access including these Class action suits: Mrs. Fields, HelloFresh, Dell, Uncommon Goods, Whole Foods, Marriott, Talbots, Synchrony, Yankee Candle, Procter & Gamble, Barstool Sports, Johnson & Johnson, FanDuel’s, Dark Horse Comics, Colgate University, Modshop, Zola, Benihana, Chic Soul, Delmonico’s Italian Steakhouse of Florida Inc, Madame Alexander Doll, Jackbox Games, Insomnia Cookies, Etsy, Lisa Frank, Gap, Lane Bryant, Klondike, HR Block, edX, Peapod, Miami University, McLennan County, Carnival Cruise Line, National Museum of Crime and Punishment, Quik Trip, Brookstone, Ally Financial Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC.

Claims can be general in nature or very specific:
eg: The consumer behind the FanDuel’s website complaint, claimed the site was not fully compatible with his Microsoft brand JAWS screen-reading software. 

Claims are brought about by individuals, organizations or class actions.

Some of the lawsuits, especially in recent times have settled for significant sums:
2008 Retailer Target Corp. was ordered to pay $6 million in relation to the lawsuit for Digital equality Vs the cost to remediate or provide digital solutions for equal access?
In 2016  Davis v. BMI/BMD Travelware, San Bernadino Superior Court, California, March 21, 2016.  was ordered to pay $4,000 in damages, plus Attorney fees.
Noting that settlement does not take into consideration all of the external and ongoing costs of litigation.
Start a Free – no obligation – Trial today.

A digital business in this era is as important if not more so than bricks and mortar so why is business choosing to shut people out?